dimethyl sulfoxide Search Results


99
MedChemExpress hydroxychloroquine
Hydroxychloroquine, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/hydroxychloroquine/product/MedChemExpress
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
hydroxychloroquine - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
TargetMol treatment with vehicle dmso
Treatment With Vehicle Dmso, supplied by TargetMol, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/treatment with vehicle dmso/product/TargetMol
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
treatment with vehicle dmso - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Valiant Co Ltd dmso
Dmso, supplied by Valiant Co Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/dmso/product/Valiant Co Ltd
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dmso - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Santa Cruz Biotechnology taxol
Taxol, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/taxol/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
taxol - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Valiant Co Ltd dimethyl sulfoxide dmso
Dimethyl Sulfoxide Dmso, supplied by Valiant Co Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/dimethyl sulfoxide dmso/product/Valiant Co Ltd
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dimethyl sulfoxide dmso - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Cell Signaling Technology Inc dimethyl sulfoxide dmso
Dimethyl Sulfoxide Dmso, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/dimethyl sulfoxide dmso/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dimethyl sulfoxide dmso - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Santa Cruz Biotechnology sterile dimethyl sulfoxide dmso
Sterile Dimethyl Sulfoxide Dmso, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/sterile dimethyl sulfoxide dmso/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
sterile dimethyl sulfoxide dmso - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

91
BOC Sciences dimethyl sulfoxide
Dimethyl Sulfoxide, supplied by BOC Sciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/dimethyl sulfoxide/product/BOC Sciences
Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dimethyl sulfoxide - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
91/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Biosynth Carbosynth dimethyl sulfoxide
Dimethyl Sulfoxide, supplied by Biosynth Carbosynth, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/dimethyl sulfoxide/product/Biosynth Carbosynth
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dimethyl sulfoxide - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
MedChemExpress lps dmso group
Lps Dmso Group, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/lps dmso group/product/MedChemExpress
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
lps dmso group - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
MedChemExpress dcz
Dcz, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/dcz/product/MedChemExpress
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dcz - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
ZeptoMetrix corporation dmso
Wnt/β-catenin Signaling Determines AP Gradients of Cell-Cell Adhesions (A) Schematic diagram of E12 embryo, and diagram of cell-sorting assay where cells pre-treated with <t>DMSO,</t> Chiron, Dkk1, or RA were allowed to self-sort based on their adhesion affinity. The gradient of purple color indicates the activation rate of different signals upon chemical treatment. (B) Quantification of the percentage of sorting <t>patterns.</t> <t>NPCs</t> treated with chemicals were from E12 T or Br. Br versus T resulted in significantly (80%) higher enveloped phenotype than segregated 5% and checkerboard 15%. Br versus T-Dkk1 resulted in significantly (58%) higher checkerboard phenotype than segregated 14% and enveloped 28% phenotypes. Br versus T-RA resulted in significantly (70%) higher checkerboard than 12% segregated and 18% enveloped. Br-Chiron versus T resulted in significantly (47%) higher checkerboard phenotype than segregated 30% and segregated 23% phenotypes. Br-Chiron versus T-Chiron E12 resulted in significantly (52%) higher enveloped phenotype than segregated 3% and checkerboard 45%. Br versus Br-DMSO resulted in significantly (88%) higher checkerboard phenotype than enveloped 12% phenotype. Br versus Br-Chiron resulted in significantly (72%) higher enveloped phenotype than checkerboard 28%. Data are shown as percentage; number of independent experiments = 3; number of examined neurospheres = 1,638. (C) RT-PCR analyses present the mRNA fold change in β-catenin , Lef1 , Tcf4 , Axin2 , and Cyclin D1 expression levels upon activation of Wnt signaling with 2 μM Chiron. Data are shown as mean ± SD; number of independent experiments = 3. ∗ p < 0.001 via Student's t test. (D) qRT-PCR analysis shows the fold change in mRNA levels of Wnt -related genes pre-treated with chemicals. Data are shown as mean ± SD; number of independent experiments = 3; ∗ p < 0.001 via one-way ANOVA. (E) qRT-PCR of Wnt -related genes in tail NPCs pre-treated with DMSO or 1 μM RA. Data are shown as mean ± SD; number of independent experiments = 3; ∗ p < 0.001 via Student's t test. Orange shading indicates the downstream genes of RA signaling. (F and I) Box plots for the directionality of brachial (F) and tail (I) NPCs pre-treated with chemicals during the scratch assay. Data are shown as median ± SD; number of independent experiments = 4; number of examined cells = 401; ∗ p < 0.001 via one-way ANOVA on ranks. (G and J) Top shows cell trajectory of migrating brachial (G) and tail (J) NPCs, and the bottom shows the angle histograms (polar graph) representing the direction of migrating cells at the leading and following domains. Different lengths of the angle bar represent different grouped cells with a particular angle. Front (angle 0°–180°) and rear (angle 180°–360°) cells were grouped based on the position of the centrosome. Number of independent experiments = 3; number of examined cells = 395. (H and K) Measurement of front-to-rear ratio of brachial (H) and tail (K) NPCs that were determined in polar graphs following chemical treatment. Data are shown as mean ± SD; number of independent experiments = 3; number of examined cells = 395; ∗ p < 0.001 via one-way ANOVA.
Dmso, supplied by ZeptoMetrix corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/dmso/product/ZeptoMetrix corporation
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dmso - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Wnt/β-catenin Signaling Determines AP Gradients of Cell-Cell Adhesions (A) Schematic diagram of E12 embryo, and diagram of cell-sorting assay where cells pre-treated with DMSO, Chiron, Dkk1, or RA were allowed to self-sort based on their adhesion affinity. The gradient of purple color indicates the activation rate of different signals upon chemical treatment. (B) Quantification of the percentage of sorting patterns. NPCs treated with chemicals were from E12 T or Br. Br versus T resulted in significantly (80%) higher enveloped phenotype than segregated 5% and checkerboard 15%. Br versus T-Dkk1 resulted in significantly (58%) higher checkerboard phenotype than segregated 14% and enveloped 28% phenotypes. Br versus T-RA resulted in significantly (70%) higher checkerboard than 12% segregated and 18% enveloped. Br-Chiron versus T resulted in significantly (47%) higher checkerboard phenotype than segregated 30% and segregated 23% phenotypes. Br-Chiron versus T-Chiron E12 resulted in significantly (52%) higher enveloped phenotype than segregated 3% and checkerboard 45%. Br versus Br-DMSO resulted in significantly (88%) higher checkerboard phenotype than enveloped 12% phenotype. Br versus Br-Chiron resulted in significantly (72%) higher enveloped phenotype than checkerboard 28%. Data are shown as percentage; number of independent experiments = 3; number of examined neurospheres = 1,638. (C) RT-PCR analyses present the mRNA fold change in β-catenin , Lef1 , Tcf4 , Axin2 , and Cyclin D1 expression levels upon activation of Wnt signaling with 2 μM Chiron. Data are shown as mean ± SD; number of independent experiments = 3. ∗ p < 0.001 via Student's t test. (D) qRT-PCR analysis shows the fold change in mRNA levels of Wnt -related genes pre-treated with chemicals. Data are shown as mean ± SD; number of independent experiments = 3; ∗ p < 0.001 via one-way ANOVA. (E) qRT-PCR of Wnt -related genes in tail NPCs pre-treated with DMSO or 1 μM RA. Data are shown as mean ± SD; number of independent experiments = 3; ∗ p < 0.001 via Student's t test. Orange shading indicates the downstream genes of RA signaling. (F and I) Box plots for the directionality of brachial (F) and tail (I) NPCs pre-treated with chemicals during the scratch assay. Data are shown as median ± SD; number of independent experiments = 4; number of examined cells = 401; ∗ p < 0.001 via one-way ANOVA on ranks. (G and J) Top shows cell trajectory of migrating brachial (G) and tail (J) NPCs, and the bottom shows the angle histograms (polar graph) representing the direction of migrating cells at the leading and following domains. Different lengths of the angle bar represent different grouped cells with a particular angle. Front (angle 0°–180°) and rear (angle 180°–360°) cells were grouped based on the position of the centrosome. Number of independent experiments = 3; number of examined cells = 395. (H and K) Measurement of front-to-rear ratio of brachial (H) and tail (K) NPCs that were determined in polar graphs following chemical treatment. Data are shown as mean ± SD; number of independent experiments = 3; number of examined cells = 395; ∗ p < 0.001 via one-way ANOVA.

Journal: Stem Cell Reports

Article Title: Anteroposterior Wnt-RA Gradient Defines Adhesion and Migration Properties of Neural Progenitors in Developing Spinal Cord

doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2020.08.016

Figure Lengend Snippet: Wnt/β-catenin Signaling Determines AP Gradients of Cell-Cell Adhesions (A) Schematic diagram of E12 embryo, and diagram of cell-sorting assay where cells pre-treated with DMSO, Chiron, Dkk1, or RA were allowed to self-sort based on their adhesion affinity. The gradient of purple color indicates the activation rate of different signals upon chemical treatment. (B) Quantification of the percentage of sorting patterns. NPCs treated with chemicals were from E12 T or Br. Br versus T resulted in significantly (80%) higher enveloped phenotype than segregated 5% and checkerboard 15%. Br versus T-Dkk1 resulted in significantly (58%) higher checkerboard phenotype than segregated 14% and enveloped 28% phenotypes. Br versus T-RA resulted in significantly (70%) higher checkerboard than 12% segregated and 18% enveloped. Br-Chiron versus T resulted in significantly (47%) higher checkerboard phenotype than segregated 30% and segregated 23% phenotypes. Br-Chiron versus T-Chiron E12 resulted in significantly (52%) higher enveloped phenotype than segregated 3% and checkerboard 45%. Br versus Br-DMSO resulted in significantly (88%) higher checkerboard phenotype than enveloped 12% phenotype. Br versus Br-Chiron resulted in significantly (72%) higher enveloped phenotype than checkerboard 28%. Data are shown as percentage; number of independent experiments = 3; number of examined neurospheres = 1,638. (C) RT-PCR analyses present the mRNA fold change in β-catenin , Lef1 , Tcf4 , Axin2 , and Cyclin D1 expression levels upon activation of Wnt signaling with 2 μM Chiron. Data are shown as mean ± SD; number of independent experiments = 3. ∗ p < 0.001 via Student's t test. (D) qRT-PCR analysis shows the fold change in mRNA levels of Wnt -related genes pre-treated with chemicals. Data are shown as mean ± SD; number of independent experiments = 3; ∗ p < 0.001 via one-way ANOVA. (E) qRT-PCR of Wnt -related genes in tail NPCs pre-treated with DMSO or 1 μM RA. Data are shown as mean ± SD; number of independent experiments = 3; ∗ p < 0.001 via Student's t test. Orange shading indicates the downstream genes of RA signaling. (F and I) Box plots for the directionality of brachial (F) and tail (I) NPCs pre-treated with chemicals during the scratch assay. Data are shown as median ± SD; number of independent experiments = 4; number of examined cells = 401; ∗ p < 0.001 via one-way ANOVA on ranks. (G and J) Top shows cell trajectory of migrating brachial (G) and tail (J) NPCs, and the bottom shows the angle histograms (polar graph) representing the direction of migrating cells at the leading and following domains. Different lengths of the angle bar represent different grouped cells with a particular angle. Front (angle 0°–180°) and rear (angle 180°–360°) cells were grouped based on the position of the centrosome. Number of independent experiments = 3; number of examined cells = 395. (H and K) Measurement of front-to-rear ratio of brachial (H) and tail (K) NPCs that were determined in polar graphs following chemical treatment. Data are shown as mean ± SD; number of independent experiments = 3; number of examined cells = 395; ∗ p < 0.001 via one-way ANOVA.

Article Snippet: For pre-treatment, NPCs at passage 0 were pre-treated with DMSO, 3 μM Chiron, 200 ng/mL DKK-1, 1 μM XAC-939, 1 μM Wnt-C59, or 1 μM RA for 4 consecutive days.

Techniques: FACS, Activation Assay, Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Wound Healing Assay